YES, I INTEND TO VOTE!

 

Upon becoming a citizen of the United States, I knew I would earn the right to vote - that right I cherish. Especially now, considering that some 73% of Americans believe that the country is on the wrong track (Mehlman Consulting). My vote might just make the difference to stem this downward trend.

 

Agreed, the political climate is toxic. However, that toxicity is mainly because of the personalities in the presidential race, rather than the issues at stake. To ignore the issues and focus almost exclusively on leadership personality traits is a distraction.

 

I believe I can make a difference, and I intend to do so on Tuesday, November 05. As I prayerfully prepare myself to vote, I know that I cannot limit my thinking to the two presidential candidates. As far as I am concerned, both candidates have flaws. To date, the variety of salacious disclosures will make it very difficult for either candidate to lead with untarnished confidence.  

 

I understand that according to the media consortium exit poll, “evangelicals make up an average of 25.4% of the electorate in the past ten election cycles going back 20 years.” However, many Evangelicals do not vote. About 30% are not registered to vote, and of those evangelical registered to vote, 40% do not vote. Studies show that if roughly 5% more evangelicals vote, there can be major changes in the 2024 local, state and federal elections.

 

Separate and apart from the outcome, I believe I have a duty to vote. Firstly, as a Christian, and secondly as a citizen. Jesus calls me salt and light. When he said this in his Sermon on the Mount, he was informing me that I am expected to make a difference in my community. As salt, I can preserve and bring flavor. As light, I can dispel darkness and provide hope.

 

In their letters, Paul and Peter contend that governance was ordained by God, and we must submit to governing authorities. We must pay taxes to support governing authorities. We must show respect, give honor and pray for those in authority (Romans 13:1-7 & 1 Peter 2:13-17). This is an invitation to engage in civil affairs.

 

My faith defines me, and the Bill of Rights protects my right to practice my faith. I want to live according to the dictates of my conscience. I have no problem living in a religiously diverse culture. I want to be sure that all faith-based institutions are protected from government discrimination. Whichever party protects these rights will get my vote.

 

The Bible calls on governing authorities to protect and promote. Protection involves restraining evil by punishing evildoers. Promoting peace and orderly conduct by rewarding good behaviour. Governments should establish systems and institutions to ensure protection, especially for the less fortunate and voice-less. Such governance is for the common good of society.

 

The biblical prophets are consistent and adamant in their condemnation of injustice to the poor, and frequently follow their statements by requiring the government to act justly. That prophetic expectation did not apply only to the kings of Israel but was also extended to the kings of neighbouring lands and peoples. Jeremiah, speaking of King Josiah, said, "He defended the cause of the poor and needy, and so all went well" (Jeremiah 22:16). Whichever party respects my worldview, gets my vote.

 

The institution of marriage, defined as a union between a man and a woman, has served every culture for millennia. Both social scientists and theologians will agree that “the institution of marriage is the relationship that best provides for the most favorable exercise of human sexuality, the overall well-being of adults, and the proper socialization of children.” Agreed, other familial relationships meet similar needs. However, lifelong, monogamous marriage is the best option. I am eager to vote for a party that shares my passion.

 

When my family and I came to this country 33 years ago, our privileges were limited by our overseas student visas. I was determined to live within the immigration limits placed on us. I had a moral obligation to model to my children that we were a law-abiding family. In addition, I had a biblical obligation to display consistency in all areas of my life. We were deprived of luxuries, but maintained our integrity.

 

I want other immigrants to have a similar appreciation for the laws of the land. It was good to hear the officer say at my citizenship interview, “We are sorry it took so long, but welcome to America.” I plan to vote for a party that respects the process of law and order when it comes to immigration. Everyone wins when we play clean. You now know why I intend to vote on November 05.

 

 

DID GOD SPARE HIS LIFE?

 

In 1932, Adolf Hitler and several members of his staff fell ill after dining at a hotel in Berlin. Hitler seemed least affected by the alleged poisoning. This incident was one of at least forty-two attempts to assassinate Hitler. Hitler was even quoted as saying: “Even today I am not ashamed to say that, overpowered by stormy enthusiasm, I fell down on my knees and thanked Heaven from an overflowing heart for granting me the good fortune of being permitted to live at this time”. (Mein Kampf, Vol. 1 Chapter 5).

Similarly, many believe God spared former President Donald Trump’s life after the recent assassination attempt. I believe God spared the lives of the wicked German leader, and the former President. Their lives were spared, not because they earned the right to be alive. Rather, because those were not the appointed times for either of them to die. We will all eventually die, but only God determines when. Old Testament Job understood this truth. In the middle of his significant losses, he uttered, “… the Lord gave, and the Lord has taken away; may the name of the Lord be praised” (Job 1:21).

Therefore, to be spared from any form of death is to experience the kindness of God. That expression of God’s kindness is intentional. It is intended to remind us of the certainty of death and the frailness of life. The apostle Paul contends that the kindness of God is intended to lead us to repentance (Romans 2:4). In other words, to be spared from death is not luck or chance. Rather, it is a wake-up-call. A call to realize that “… life is a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes” (James 4:14).

That perspective on life also applies to fire-fighter Corey Comperatore. The same attempted assassin who shot Donald Trump, killed Corey. Corey’s daughter Allyson, described her father as “the best dad a girl could ever ask for”, adding that “he was a man of God, loved Jesus fiercely, and also looked after our church and our members as family”. His death was not because God was wicked. The Psalmist would likely say in this situation, “… all the days ordained for me were written in your book, before one of them came to be” (Psalm 139:16). Or, “precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of his saints”

(Psalm 116:15).  

We cannot fathom why God allows some people to die tragically, and others to survive the same tragedies. Because tragedy is a fact of life, what about ensuring that we live prepared for tragedy. I am not only referring to having adequate health and life insurance. I am issuing a wake-up call, like the prophet Amos, to “… prepare to meet your God…” (Amos 4:12). So often I am reminded of that when I attend or officiate at funerals.

Tragedy leaves gaping holes for loved ones. The pain is so real, we sometimes ask, where is God when it hurts? He is just where he was when the Psalmist declared, “Find rest, O my soul, in God alone, my hope comes from him. He alone is my rock and my salvation; he is my fortress, I will not be shaken” (Psalm 62:5-6). Let us never forget God’s response to Job, after Job and his friends attempted to explain pain. The Lord asked, “would you discredit my justice? Would you condemn me to justify yourself” (Job 40:8)? On another occasion the Lord said, “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways…” (Isaiah 55:8).

It is because God understands pain and loss, the Psalmist described God as “a Father to the fatherless and a defender of widows…” (Psalm 68:5). God was not absent when Corey Comperatore was killed. He allowed it. God also moved many to donate millions of dollars to reduce economic pain to the grieving family. Corey died when he covered his family and took the bullet for them. That family will always remember the hero who died for them. What a noble legacy.

Whatever the political outcome in the upcoming elections, Donald Trump and others who were shot should be different. Agreed, God spared their lives, not because of their nobility, but because God was issuing a warning. A warning to remind them and all of us of the frailness of life and the need to live in a state of readiness to meet our Maker. That reminder was an act of kindness and favor. To squander God’s kindness and favor is reckless. As quoted earlier, the kindness of God should lead to repentance, not arrogance.   

 

IS CHURCH A BUSINESS?

 Among other things, a church is a registered organization. Like businesses, churches have organizational structures, which may include leadership roles. The roles are a part of a hierarchical system for decision-making and accountability. Churches also need to manage finances effectively. Sources of income need to be accounted for and managed responsibly.

Both churches and businesses engage in planning, organizing events, managing facilities and providing services. Some churches run community events, similar to how businesses offer products and services. Like businesses, churches must comply with legal and regulatory requirements, such as tax and employment laws. As registered legal bodies, churches often need to maintain records, file reports and manage liabilities.

However, there are primary differences between church and business. For instance, the primary mission of a church is spiritual, focusing on worship, teaching, fellowship and evangelism. Its purpose is to fulfill religious and spiritual needs, promote faith and support spiritual growth. Unlike churches, businesses are typically profit-driven, aiming to generate revenue and provide goods and services to customers.

Businesses are driven by market demands, competition, and the goal of maximizing financial profits. Churches on the other hand are motivated by religious beliefs, values and the desire to serve God and the community. Unlike business enterprises, church members are often seen as part of a spiritual family, with a sense of belonging and shared faith.

Churches operate as non-profit organizations, reinvesting any surplus funds into their mission and community activities. Unlike businesses who report to boards and stakeholders, churches account to their members, especially regarding financial matters and leadership decisions. In offering a service, churches prioritize compassion, and community support, often providing charitable services without expecting anything in return.

As an institution, churches provide more opportunities for volunteerism than any other institution. In addition, churches facilitate more philanthropy than any other organization. Within our communities, there is no other organization that is as inter-generational as the church. In some church congregations, members can be identified as persons who were dedicated as infants and experienced conversion, baptism and marriage.

As a business, the church is managed more like a family business than a public corporation. As a family business, churches operate with “the family first philosophy”. This places emphasis on the needs of the family over what others view as the more productive approach of a corporation. In a recent newspaper article, my Jamaican friend, Dr Lawrence  Nicholson, contended that “the family-first philosophy places a premium on having and maintaining a healthy family network and keeping the family together”. In seeking to maintain a healthy family network, family enterprises often are deprived of maximizing the benefits that stem from a more business-like approach.

Is it possible that churches can suffer a similar fate? They are unable to achieve maximum results because they avoid a more business-like approach to ministry. Far too often, churches seek to appease congregants and suppress vision planning. Vision for growth is stymied because mission philosophies are too insular. Some ignore the changing dynamics necessary to reach contemporary generations for Christ. To their detriment, some churches even believe that they are committed to the unchanging message and method of the New Testament.

It took COVID to convince some churches that there is a difference between the message and methods of delivering that message. Since COVID, some churches have found more efficient ways to handle communion, receive offerings and utilize technology. Even more user-friendly ways have been found in conducting liturgy. Some churches now engage professional services to assist with promotion and counseling.

As a business, churches must take a serious look at ministry outcomes. As stewards of God’s resources, we cannot ignore improving our human resources. Our people need to be trained to ensure better outcomes in discipleship. Churches that are serious about outcome-based ministry are witnessing increase in conversions and baptisms. On the other hand, many churches use their resources to “guard the flock”. Such protective strategies result in declining church growth and poor use of resources.

Even a cursory reading of the book of Acts would indicate that church growth mattered. In recording the events about the Day of Pentecost, Luke stated, “… about 3,000 were added to their number…” (Acts 2:41). Like someone providing progress reports, Luke later indicated that “… many who heard the message believed, and the number of men grew to about 5,000” (Acts 4:4). And again, “… the number of disciples in Jerusalem increased rapidly, and a large number of priests became obedient to the faith” (Acts 6:7).

In spite of the challenging circumstances under which they operated, Christians in the Early Church found creative ways to ensure that they maximized their resources to increase measurable outcomes. The same should be said of strategies in churches and para-churches today.

SUBMISSION AND SACRIFICE IN MARRIAGE

 

Even within Christian marriages, many are repulsed by the word submission. They believe the idea of submission is to condone abusive behavior. The perception is to see the idea as subjugating and relegating women to an inferior place in a marriage. From my studies, I would agree that many women continue to be subjected to despicable abuse, under the guise of being submissive. However, that understanding of abuse is because of ignorance. A proper understanding of submission in Christian marriages is totally different.

The idea of submission in marriage comes from Paul’s letter to the Ephesians – “Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord” (Ephesians 5:22). Interestingly, the word “submit” in this verse, does not appear in the original Greek text. However, the absence of the word, does not mean the absence of the idea. The idea comes from the previous verse – “submit to one another out of reverence for Christ” (Ephesians 5:21). So the context justifies the inclusion of the word in English translations.

The word “submit” appears as a participle in the original text. As a participle, it is linked to a main verb. Actually, it is the last of four participles that are linked to the main verb. The main verb appears in verse 18 – “… be filled/controlled with the Spirit…”. Paul’s argument is simple, when one is controlled by the Holy Spirit, that encounter is displayed in four areas of our lives. He identifies each area with following participles:

1) … speaking to one another with psalms, hymns, and songs from the Spirit;

2) … singing and making melody from your heart to the Lord;

3) … giving thanks to God the Father for everything…; and

4) … submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ.

That is the context from which Paul instructs women to submit to their own husbands. Initially, there is a submitting to each other. Functionally, there is a submitting to one’s husband, “as you do to the Lord”. Paul contends that the function is a part of God’s order, and he teaches what that order should look like in the following verse – “Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything” (Ephesians 5:24).

But what does it mean for the church to submit to Christ? It means that the universal church acknowledges her relationship with Christ. A relationship characterized by recognizing His authority, obedience to His teachings, dependence on His provision,  alignment with desires and trust in His leadership. The church’s submissive response to that relationship is expressed in worship, discipleship, community life and mission.

Paul is arguing that the same attitude that guides the church’s response to Christ, that same attitude should guide a woman’s response to her husband. That attitude incorporates respect, admiration, support and deference for her husband. Like with the church to Christ, this attitude is a response to values and virtues that elevate. In order for a response to be authentic, it must be voluntary. It cannot be demanded. If demanded, a response would then be forced and cannot be genuine.

Paul then turns to husbands and instructs them to “… love your wives just as Christ loved the church and gave himself for her…” (Ephesians 5:25). The word Paul uses, is the most noble of the Greek words for love. It is not a romantic or sexual word. The word is characterized by empathy and selflessness. The original word used here is an act of one’s will. It is an intentional choice that one makes to desire the best for another. It is a willingness to sacrifice pride, one’s reputation or even one’s perceived rights. Any expression of this love requires a sacrifice. It requires the husband to put his needs and well-being of the wife above his own interests.

Just as Christ’s love for the church is expected to have a purifying and nurturing effect, a husband’s love is expected to do the same for his wife. In other words, a husband’s contribution should set the tone for positive virtues and values in his marriage. In order to express His love for the church, Christ gave His life for the church. Similarly, husbands are expected to love their wives just as much as they love themselves.

The fact that this kind of information seems foreign to our thinking, it is not because the Bible is outdated, rather, it is because our society has moved away from a biblical understanding of marriage. Unfortunately, many in the church have also moved away from that understanding. The outcome of this drift is evident in the dysfunctional marriages seen in our churches today.

Paul was correct – “… this is (marriage) a profound mystery” (Ephesians 5:32). Paul saw marriage as a picture of the relationship between Jesus Christ and the church. It is in light of that reality, we must ask the question, what kind of picture am I painting with my marriage? As others look at my marriage, do they get a good idea of the relationship between Christ and His church?