Last week, more than 600 medical doctors
signed and submitted a letter to U.S. President Donald Trump. They were asking
him to end the “national shutdown” aimed at slowing the spread of the
coronavirus. The doctors feared that the widespread orders keeping businesses
closed and kids home from school, would result in “exponentially growing health
consequences.”
The letter outlines a variety of consequences
that the doctors observed resulting from the coronavirus shutdowns. Some of
these concerns include patients missing routine check-ups that could detect
heart problems or cancer. Doctors also feared the increase in substance and
alcohol abuse.
In late April, a survey was done in the
United States, using a standard measure of mental distress. For instance, a
respondent was asked how often he/she felt sad or nervous in the last month.
The results were compared with a sample of demographically similar people in
2018. The results were staggering.
The 2020 participants were eight times as
likely to screen positive for serious mental illness. Some 70% of the
respondents met criteria for moderate to serious mental illness, compared with
22% in 2018. Clearly, the pandemic has had a devastating effect on mental
health.
My studies would seem to indicate, that
whereas the pandemic has had a greater impact on the physical health of the
elderly, the same pandemic has had a greater mental impact on younger adults.
Younger adults have experience a ten-fold increase in serious mental distress,
compared with studies done in 2018. Meanwhile, adults sixty and older, had a
much smaller increase in serious mental health issues.
The true impact of the pandemic on mental
health will take some time to surface. Instances of alcoholism, homelessness,
suicide, heart attack or kidney failure are poised to increase. Increases are already
evident in unemployment, drug addiction and domestic violence. Over a longer
period, we would be adding to the list unplanned pregnancies, poverty, and a
variety of abuses.
The solution to the above social challenges
is not simple. Should governments lift restrictions in order to avoid the
mental health issues? If they do, they run the risk of facilitating the spread
of the pandemic. Agreed, a more cautious approach is preferred. But what does
that mean?
I believe our first responsibility is to
preserve life. More medical resources should be available to the more
vulnerable in our society. Guidelines for proper hygiene and physical
distancing must be observed, human life must be preserved. However, the
restrictions required for preserving lives among the more vulnerable, must be
balanced with the lessening of restrictions among less vulnerable communities.
Some mental health issues can be corrected
with time, loss of life cannot. Death is final. Death is devastating. Hence, we
need to celebrate more when persons overcome the claws of this killer virus.
The media is too obsessed with the death count rather than with the recovery
count. Stories of recovery generate hope. Stories of recovery celebrate life
and recognize heroes and heroines in the medical field.
Media intelligence company Meltwater has been
tracking some of the stories that are not gaining as much media attention.
Meltwater contends, “as news and social media continues to talk about
growing concerns and the impact that the coronavirus has had on society in
terms of restricted border entry, travel bans and disruptions to the economy,
there have been far less media mentions when it comes to the recoveries that
have been made.”
Meltwater’s
studies show that stories of recovery represent one of the four least reported
areas of the pandemic. With 26.1 million news articles talking about the
coronavirus across the globe, only about 5,000 of those news articles have
mentioned ‘recoveries’ in relation to the virus. On social media, while 223
million mentions have been made on the coronavirus, only about 8,000 of those
mentions talk about recoveries, compared to the social media mentions that
include ‘Coronavirus’ and ‘death’.
I believe, included
in the use of the term recoveries, most references would likely be about
economic recovery and not necessarily of persons who have recovered from the
virus. In other words, the media is not enamored with stories of hope. Instead,
we have been saddled with statistics of death and defeat.
Should data
on sermons be available, one wonders, where would the sermonic emphases be
placed? Would the emphasis be on restoration, recovery and transformation? Is
it possible that we are hearing too much from our pulpits about judgement and
the need to repent? Then, who is mending the broken-hearted? Who is taking good
news to the poor? Who is helping to release the oppressed? Affirmative answers
to these and many more questions were evident in the ministry of Jesus.
The COVID-19
pandemic has forced many of us to rearrange our plans for this holiday weekend.
I pray that our unplanned schedules will include much time for reflection on
the impact of the pandemic. Let us not be overcome by statistics of death and defeat,
and embrace stories of hope and optimism.
1 comment:
A rather interesting post with vital information for mental health practitioners and preachers. We need to change the script and encourage positive perspectives. If each of us make a concerted effort to change the way we speak and write from negative to positive, the results would be amazing.
God bless you for leading the way, Dr Corbin.
Post a Comment